Originally Posted by
TommyDee
From a scan perspective, there are micron level data acquisition machines that cost more than your car. The problem is not the "3D" part, it is acquiring and formulating the data from the highly sensitive "probe". The probe is a huge chunk of the cost. It's quality level is what determines accuracy if the downstream processors take advantage of it. The range over which the device offers that level of accuracy is relevant to the end price tag as well. How big a chunk do you want to scan how fast?
So you want to scan something car sized. How close to real life do you want the scan data to be? How accurate is your stitching software to manage a continuous scan? Does the scanner provide special orientation data with the data capture? How accurate is this special orientation mechanism? What is the sensitivity of the probe and hardware?
So the answer is simple, cheap and accurate are opposite sizes of the spectrum... what do I really need at what price point.
If the price point is under $1000, you get hardware and software that is currently commercially or readily available. They just scale the data to meet your needs. Bigger is easier for these machines (more forgiving). They optimize for "rooms" or "people".
Want to go to the other end of the scope... 3D scan a home for advertising? Now you are talking integrated system. Several $100K for a commercial quality setup.
The technology is not new. The tech is from the optical measuring systems. They start at $10K and most implementations are well north of $50K.
If you're doing cars, and you want real quality... you're into a solid 6 figures.
If you just want to scan the local swap meet hot rods, you better bring a large hard drive, but you can do that for $500.