-
Administrator
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 2 Likes, 1 Dislikes
-
The OWL works team shook the bottle vigorously before putting in the resin @bolsoncerrado. The issue with the print is that the upper layer seems fine, but the bottom layer is bumpy and softer. Print was done at ambient temperature, so I don't think that is the issue.
I have sent details and STL file to OWL team and await their reply. I'll keep you all posted.
-
Administrator
You mean the print started before the team left?
-
This print was done a couple of days ago. The team ran a smaller print test when they were here to calibrate resin etc. The test print I gave them broke into pieces when trying to remove from build plate 
I also noticed (after they left) that the test print should have actually printed thicker than it actually did (printed about 0.5mm thick - should have been 2mm). Might be some calibration issues but I'll keep testing and await feedback.
-
Administrator
If you used the resin left in the VAT by the team then you should have shaked / stirred it a bit between prints.
I've learned the lesson as well. the hard way of course.
I use my window wiper to slowly move the resin back and forth 10 times or so, this makes the pigment reunite again between prints.
The other way is to put the resin back into the bottle and reshake it, or discard it and use a new bottle if you're rich
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Sounds like a plan. I emptied resin into a container, strained out the rubbish, shook and poured back in (I'm not rich enough to waste resin
)
Starting another print and have also reduced exposure time to 30s to see what effect that has. Thanks @bolsoncerrado
-
Administrator
Before you reduce exposure time "at random" be sure your environmental conditions do cure the resin though 
And keep us posted
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-

Originally Posted by
bolsoncerrado
Before you reduce exposure time "at random" be sure your environmental conditions do cure the resin though
And keep us posted

I decreased it to 35000, however found some layers in between didn't cure properly. Increased it to 45000 and got better results.
I've decided to change resin and have ordered some FunToDo resin (Black and white). I should have it next week so will post a comparison. Seems like a better resin all round.
-

Originally Posted by
sukhvir
Is this a result of undercuring? Also, what resin are you using woale? I have MJ G+ Black, but yours seems more pigmented.
I'm not sure this is due to undercuring. It's a large thin flat surface you're printing, maybe something to do with shrinkage? Looks like you tilted along the Y axis, maybe tilt a bit along the X axis as well...
I'm using Fun To Do 'deep black' resin which seems to remain pigmented allot longer (>12h) compared to MJ G+ (<4h).
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
Thanks woale. I appreciate the feedback. I have ordered some Fun To Do resin and their quality seems far better. Also, I'm going to try rotating on X and Y axis to see how it affects results.
I thought FDM printing was hard, however it's a breeze compared to SLA so far.